You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Once the major changes are in place for various rework of model output time (standardizing metadata, removing 0th time step, and putting time in the middle of the averaging interval), we should review the new output to make sure it looks good.
At this point the changes are in place for CAM. This review can probably be done once the changes are in place for CTSM (ESCOMP/CTSM#1059, ESCOMP/CTSM#925, ESCOMP/CTSM#1693). There may still be some other outstanding needs at that point, but the most important changes should be done by then.
Once the major changes are in place for various rework of model output time (standardizing metadata, removing 0th time step, and putting time in the middle of the averaging interval), we should review the new output to make sure it looks good.
At this point the changes are in place for CAM. This review can probably be done once the changes are in place for CTSM (ESCOMP/CTSM#1059, ESCOMP/CTSM#925, ESCOMP/CTSM#1693). There may still be some other outstanding needs at that point, but the most important changes should be done by then.
See also https://github.com/orgs/ESCOMP/projects/2/views/11.
@phillips-ad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: