Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Proposal to move to uWSGI #62

Open
decached opened this issue Sep 9, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Proposal to move to uWSGI #62

decached opened this issue Sep 9, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@decached
Copy link

decached commented Sep 9, 2016

Let's use uWSGI as it performs better in combination with nginx than gunicorn
@jpalazz2
Copy link
Member

uWSGI is more performant than gunicorn when you begin to hit the level of 100's of reqeusts/second. A level which this is never very unlikely to reach. Plus gunicorn is massively easier to setup.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@decached @jpalazz2