You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Latency is relevant to the evaluation equipment, so why do not you report Parameters and FLOPs? And the code is not available.
In your demo [https://hubert0527.github.io/InstaNAS/], networks are wired in the same architecture when facing different input samples. I do not see the input-dependent form. It seems your method learned a fixed architecture in your distribution, which is a conflict with your motivation.
So I doubt the fairness of the experimental results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Latency is relevant to the evaluation equipment, so why do not you report Parameters and FLOPs? And the code is not available.
In your demo [https://hubert0527.github.io/InstaNAS/], networks are wired in the same architecture when facing different input samples. I do not see the input-dependent form. It seems your method learned a fixed architecture in your distribution, which is a conflict with your motivation.
So I doubt the fairness of the experimental results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: