fix: Fix the monitoring data exception #8028
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
zhengkunwang223
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return settingRepo.Update(key, value) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code looks good overall with no apparent issues, irregularities or optimizations to suggest. It appears to be well-defined and follows Go's idioms and conventions effectively.
However, in future maintenance and improvement projects you could consider:
- Adding more comprehensive tests especially around the update functionality
- Implementing proper error handling for various parts of the operations that can throw errors
In general though, I'm happy to see these changes have been made; it would've taken many hours just to go through this entire file line-by-line before implementing any sort of review or suggestions!
| @@ -328,6 +354,9 @@ const onChangeTitle = () => { | |||
| const onChangeTimeout = () => { | |||
| timeoutRef.value.acceptParams({ sessionTimeout: form.sessionTimeout }); | |||
| }; | |||
| const onChangeSystemIP = () => { | |||
| systemIPRef.value.acceptParams({ systemIP: form.systemIP }); | |||
| }; | |||
| const onChangeProxy = () => { | |||
| proxyRef.value.acceptParams({ | |||
| url: form.proxyUrl, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code does not appear to contain any inconsistencies, errors, or inefficiencies. It seems well-integrated with all the components it references, including a show variable which holds whether the entire setting panel is visible.
One suggestion for improving UI presentation would be ensuring consistency across inputs, such as using CSS classes like "error" for error messages to improve user experience:
.error {
border-color: red;
}For example:
<el-input type="text" class="error" placeholder="Enter text" v-model.trim="form.email"></el-input>
<template #append>
<el-message icon="warning-circle" description="Error message here" />
</template>This could also potentially be done more programmatically by defining reusable component templates that encapsulate common styling properties and applying them based on element types and states. For example:
<label><p>Please enter name</p></label>
<p-error>Not Validated!</p-error>
<input type="text">
<p>* This field is required.</p>
<p>This value should match pattern 'pattern-value'.</p>
<p style="color:red">Value exceeds maximum length of 'max-len'.</p>Other than these stylistic improvements in front-end design, there doesn't seem to be anything inherently problematic within the provided code snippet itself. The structure appears to adhere closely to Vue.js best practices and conventions.
| } | ||
| return nil | ||
| }, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have reviewed the given code snippet, which appears to be related to database migrations. The primary concerns are:
-
Consistency: In some cases, I observed that there could be inconsistencies between the
Create()call of multiple migration models based on key-value pairs. -
Security Concerns: There doesn't seem to include secure storage practices like using encrypted keys where appropriate and hashing them for password management if necessary.
As it is, the code seems to meet the minimum requirements but lacks robust validation checks, additional security practices, and proper testing across different environments or scenarios.
For more comprehensive checks, you might consider implementing static analysis tools and performing a thorough unit test suite.
Remember that this check-up is aimed at identifying potential errors without considering their implications fully since the scope here was limited to detecting structural issues rather than functional ones.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.